<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Daily News, Sports, Business, Immigration and Lifestyle Features on North, Central and South America, Latin America and the Caribbean. &#187; Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/category/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com</link>
	<description>Newsamericasnow.com .com - Daily News, Sports, Business, Immigration and Lifestyle Features on North, Central and South America, Latin America and the Caribbean.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Newsamericasnow.com .com - Daily News, Sports, Business, Immigration and Lifestyle Features on North, Central and South America, Latin America and the Caribbean.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Daily News, Sports, Business, Immigration and Lifestyle Features on North, Central and South America, Latin America and the Caribbean.</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Newsamericasnow.com .com - Daily News, Sports, Business, Immigration and Lifestyle Features on North, Central and South America, Latin America and the Caribbean.</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Growth, Austerity And Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/growth-austerity-and-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/growth-austerity-and-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=48083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Jessop News Americas, LONDON, England, Fri. May 18, 2012: Last week the people of Greece and France voted against austerity. In the days that followed, the markets, global investors and speculators cast their ballot. They drove the Euro and shares downwards and interest rates on government bonds upwards. For their part, economically powerful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/caricom.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/caricom-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="caricom" width="300" height="250" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-19556" /></a>By David Jessop</p>
<p>News Americas, LONDON, England, Fri. May 18, 2012: Last week the people of Greece and France voted against austerity. </p>
<p>In the days that followed, the markets, global investors and speculators cast their ballot. They drove the Euro and shares downwards and interest rates on government bonds upwards. For their part, economically powerful European nations emphasised that their tough agreement with Greece could not be unpicked if it wished to remain in the Eurozone.</p>
<p>What happens next in Greece’s case is far from certain. As this is being written talks are proceeding between left wing minority parties and the two larger parties that had previously accepted the terms of a European and IMF bailout. </p>
<p>How any such coalition might succeed is hard to see, given the smaller parties and the electorate’s vociferous and sometimes violent rejection of any further cuts in the public sector, social services or government spending.  So much so that a more likely scenario, if the newly elected factions of the left fail to achieve agreement with those they are courting, is that a second general election will be called, an even greater mandate given to the parties of the far left and far right and a slow motion economic collapse will ensue. </p>
<p>Under such circumstances European and the IMF economic orthodoxy will be rejected, Greece will be forced to withdraw from the Euro, there will be renewed pressure on Europe’s weaker mainly southern economies and the future of the Euro and an EU of twenty seven states will become uncertain.</p>
<p>With France, in contrast an economically powerful and important EU nation, it has yet to be seen how its new socialist President and his government intend arguing for both growth and austerity in a manner that meets the expectation of the electorate and stays within  the EU Fiscal Pact signed in March of this year.</p>
<p>Elections in France and Greece have brought into sharp focus the challenge posed by cutting public expenditure as a way out of economic crisis and the way this contrasts with what voters want and what it is realistic to expect. </p>
<p>What the actions of increasingly angry electorates in Europe and beyond suggest is that in the absence of growth, there are limits to how far any government can go in imposing economic solutions even when agreed politically with other nations or international financial institutions.  They also illustrate that the world may be starting to see the first signs of limits to national leadership, politics and parliamentary democracy in a world in which economic globalisation and interdependence has taken hold.</p>
<p>The Caribbean is not immune. As the Bahamas electorate demonstrated on May 7th, they too are unhappy with high levels of unemployment and the absence of significant economic growth as well as increasing levels of crime. While the islands’ Prime Minister, Perry Christie, and his Progressive Liberal Party may have won a resounding victory, there are signs that like many others voters across the region, Bahamians want to see results within time scales that even the most committed politician may find hard to achieve.</p>
<p>This poses a problem.  Most Caribbean governments are faced with the dilemma of cutting back on expenditure to address huge level of accumulated debt and the high costs of debt servicing and are being left with no margin for stimulating growth or to increase income to deliver still widely expected levels of social service.</p>
<p>As a recent paper ‘Update on the Jamaican Economy’ from the US think tank, the Centre for Economic and Policy Research, (CEPR), points out, this situation is particularly stark in Jamaica. Even after a successful debt restructuring under the previous government, interest payments as a percentage of gross domestic product were still the highest recorded in the world in 2011. Debt servicing, the report notes, has taken up nearly fifty per cent of all budgeted expenditure over the last four fiscal years while health and education have only accounted for around twenty per cent.</p>
<p>What the CEPR report points to is the fact that indebtedness going back years has displaced public investments needed to restore normal growth and bring down persistently high levels of poverty and unemployment. </p>
<p>Quoting the Jamaican Prime Minister on taking office as saying “in a time of crisis government must act to stimulate growth,” the report contrasts this with language used by the IMF after recent negotiations for a new programme, in which it suggested both the need for ‘a growth oriented environment’ and ‘significantly higher fiscal surpluses’. This seems to translate in practice into politically difficult to deliver IMF proposals to reduce the public sector wage bill and further cuts in public expenditure.</p>
<p>Whether in Greece, Jamaica, France, the Netherlands, Ireland, the UK, St Kitts or elsewhere it is easy &#8211; party politics aside &#8211; to describe how countries and successive governments have arrived at the parlous economic state they now find themselves in and to demand polices that lead to much better financial management and control and economic recovery. What this does not do, however, is indicate the human and economic cost and particularly how the poorest, the well educated unemployed young or electorates can again have hope.</p>
<p>Last year the World Bank forecast in its regional annex on global economic prospects that it expected economic activity in the Caribbean to accelerate only marginally. However this was due in a large part to continued strong growth in the Dominican Republic and Haiti based on post hurricane reconstruction and aid flows. It suggested that growth elsewhere in the region will be more subdued as remittances and tourism have yet to show signs of moderate recovery. </p>
<p>What this suggests is that weak Caribbean economic recovery taken with the growing likelihood of a further food price shock, continuing high prices of energy, and austerity in the region’s principle feeder markets for tourism, there will be continuing high levels of indebtedness for many years to come.<br />
If Europe’s experience is any guide, austerity without growth is causing countries and their politicians to enter new, uncharted territory as the post cold war broad based consensus on democracy, the markets, social expectations, traditional politics and the supremacy of the electorate is in danger of breaking down. This situation is exacerbated by a sense that the burden is not being shared equitably and the gap between the richest and the poorest in almost all societies is growing.</p>
<p>Economic growth, austerity and democracy are uneasy bedfellows. They are matters that require new thinking.<br />
<strong><em><br />
David Jessop is the Director of the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at david.jessop@caribbean-council.org. Previous columns can be found at www.caribbean-council.org.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/growth-austerity-and-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive Report! &#8211; No Martha’s Vineyard For Obama This Summer Season</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/exclusive-report-no-marthas-vineyard-for-obama-this-summer-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/exclusive-report-no-marthas-vineyard-for-obama-this-summer-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=48080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Arthur Piccolo News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 18, 2012: Again you hear it first right here in my obscure but very, very important weekly commentary that exposes the real Barack Obama. Not from the nutty vicious pathetic mindless rich boys Right Wing Republican side of the street &#8211; and let me add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_48081" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/marthas.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/marthas-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="marthas" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-48081" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">DON’T EXPECT OBAMA HERE THIS SUMMER! </p></div><br />
By Arthur Piccolo</p>
<p>News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 18, 2012: Again you hear it first right here in my obscure but very, very important weekly commentary that exposes the real Barack Obama. </p>
<p>Not from the nutty vicious pathetic mindless rich boys Right Wing Republican side of the street &#8211; and let me add &#8211; their perverted definition of patriotism their flag waving excesses.</p>
<p>Not me! I attack Obama from the Progressive Democrat perspective I represent in my writing. What is wrong with Obama is not that he is an “extremist” as Romney and the Boys want us to believe and have convinced themselves but rather the opposite.</p>
<p>The real problem with President Barack Obama is that he is pathetically typical as President when he promised us something so much better than did not deliver it!</p>
<p>So what about Obama’s 2012 summer vacation plans now that we are nearing the summer season? What no one else is telling you! Each of the last three summers witnessed the Obama’s taking lavish vacations on Martha’s Vineyard in the best properties on that island. Not this year. Because …</p>
<p>Its election year! Barack will want us all to believe he is just one of us. Struggling away! Appreciating the simple pleasures in life!</p>
<p>This year look for the Obama’s to go to Camp David or maybe a national park in by chance a SWING state. Or maybe the Obama’s like so many other Americans will just stay home in The White House, play on the lawn and do some barbecuing.</p>
<p>Don’t laugh! Bet on the fact his campaign brain trust right now is trying to figure out how to get the most value from Barack’s summer vacation or maybe better no vacation at all!</p>
<p>President Obama will be working too hard for us every day this summer, campaigning for us to get what he knows we really need … 4 more years of Barack!</p>
<p>What this commentary and the subject of vacations is in fact all about is the Obama VACATION problem. It turns out that while up until now Obama and his team thought no one, meaning voters, would care how the First Family spent its free time the first three years of the Obama Presidency that no one was watching ….</p>
<p>Turns out that might not be true as much as the media put a Happy Face on all the Obama excursions to Hawaii most of all but many others too. Where was it being noticed? The only place it counts is in Swing States where a small number of votes go a long way.</p>
<p>Obama is right that many Americans are oblivious to how and where he has fun mostly at our expense as does the media. Many Americans are drugged into thinking our Presidents are Kings who should have as lavish a life style as possible.</p>
<p>But not everyone. Too bad there are Swing States!! The few states where votes actually count and decide the election.</p>
<p>The problem more precisely is that a key part of the Obama strategy is to pin the RICH guy label on Romney which is true. But the other necessary part of that strategy is Obama not looking RICH too. Rather being One Of Us.</p>
<p>Vacations have a way of defining peoples life styles.</p>
<p>So this week allow me to quote from a recent newspaper article ..</p>
<p>VACATION BACKLASH: BLUE COLLAR DEMS JEALOUS ANGRY AT OBAMAS ….. now that comes from a minor news source that is definitely not an Obama supporter &#8211; but still the sentiment has relevancy …</p>
<p>The Obamas are no slouches when it comes to their vacationing habits. By objective counts they have taken 16 vacations &#8211; let’s see how many do average Americans take?? &#8211; so far either all together or just Michelle and the children. Here is the list ..</p>
<p>&#8211; President’s Day 2012, Michelle and the first daughters in Aspen, Colorado to ski.<br />
&#8211; Christmas 2011, the first family in Hawaii for an extended vacation.<br />
&#8211; Summer 2011, in Martha’s Vineyard, Mass., for the annual beach break.<br />
&#8211; June 2011, the first lady, her mother and daughters traveled to South Africa and Botswana.<br />
&#8211; President’s Day 2011, the first lady and first daughters travel to Vail to ski.<br />
&#8211; Christmas 2010, in Hawaii.<br />
&#8211; August 2010, the first family traveled to Panama City Beach, Fla., for some sun and fun at the beach.<br />
&#8211; August 2010, Obama spent the weekend alone in Chicago for his 49th birthday bash.<br />
&#8211; August 2010, the first lady and daughter Sasha traveled to Spain for a mother-daughter vacation.<br />
&#8211; August 2010, summer vacation again at Martha’s Vineyard.<br />
&#8211; July 2010, the first family went to Mount Desert Island, Maine.<br />
&#8211; May 2010, the first family had a four-day trip to Chicago.<br />
&#8211; March 2010, first lady and daughter spend Spring Break in New York City.<br />
&#8211; Christmas 2009, Hawaii again for the annual break.<br />
&#8211; August 2009, at Yellowstone National Park and the Grand Canyon for a short vacation.<br />
&#8211; August 2009, their first summer vacation as first family at Martha’s Vineyard, Mass.<br />
The real problem for Obama is both psychological perception and in fact two real places &#8211; Hawaii and Martha’s Vineyard. Neither of which reflect “middle class values.” Also Michelle’s vacation without Barack to Spain was pure excess at our expense.</p>
<p>Most of all is the contradiction between who Barack Obama led us to believe he is and who he is. Many voters who supported him last time did so with a real if imprecise impression Barack Obama would be different so very different as President. He isn’t.</p>
<p>So what do his vacations say about him. That he is just as interested in enjoying the luxuries of office and wealth as any other President and if anything a bit more so especially if you include their lavish parties and dinners at The White House. That taking care of Barack and Family as well as possible is a priority even if that distances himself from us.</p>
<p>So there is no law Presidents or their wives can’t vacation in Hawaii and on Martha’s Vineyard or party in Spain but at the same time Obama could have said NO. He could have said I am a symbol for the nation for ALL Americans I should not emphasize the life styles of the rich and famous. I will use my vacation time to display restraint and enjoy myself in more modest surroundings.</p>
<p>But that is NOT Barack Obama. So does it matter?</p>
<p>OF COURSE IT DOES! It is why President Obama is not going to vacation on Martha’s Vineyard or Hawaii before Election Day but if he wins re-election bet on him being in Hawaii and on Martha’s Vineyard even more and longer over the next 4 years than the last 4 because he doesn’t have any more campaigns to win.</p>
<p>And it will begin with this Christmas vacation to Hawaii longer and more lavish than any before whether he wins or not ….</p>
<p>If I am wrong about President Obama’s summer vacation this year, be sure to let me know. Think I’m wrong? I’ll take your bet!</p>
<p><strong><em>About The Writer: Arthur Piccolo is a professional writer and commentator and often writes about Latin America for New Americas.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/exclusive-report-no-marthas-vineyard-for-obama-this-summer-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OBAMA’S “EVOLVING” PRESIDENCY</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obamas-evolving-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obamas-evolving-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=47421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Arthur Piccolo News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 11, 2012: Are there shades of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” in President Obama’s finally coming out of the Political Closet and saying yes he supports gay marriage? I ask this since we all now know Barack Obama is a big fan of “evolution” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Arthur Piccolo</p>
<p><div id="attachment_47422" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Obama_Clooney_620.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Obama_Clooney_620-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="57433135WM012_George_Cloone" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-47422" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">“Ok I Did It Now Show Us The Money”</p></div>News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 11, 2012: Are there shades of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” in President Obama’s finally coming out of the Political Closet and saying yes he supports gay marriage? </p>
<p>I ask this since we all now know Barack Obama is a big fan of “evolution” &#8211; his evolution.</p>
<p>Call him Barack Obama the “evolving” President!</p>
<p>Except there is no evolution taking place here either in the way Charles Darwin meant or Obama would have us believe. The only evolution going on this week in The White House is Obama’s “evolving” re-election strategy. Not his position on gay marriage.</p>
<p>Should we believe that VP Biden went on a Sunday talk show and just blurted out unexpectedly that he supports gay marriage and that then Obama had to come out in response? I think not.</p>
<p>This did not come across as one of Biden’s bloopers but rather a carefully rehearsed line that was well read. Why do it? Because Obama thought he could get away with his VP coming out for gay marriage and that would give him cover so he did not need to do so before the election and still satisfy his election base.</p>
<p>If that was the strategy, it did not work and this resulted in the widely described hasty interview Obama arranged so he could tell the world his position had finally magically “evolved” all the way.</p>
<p>What is going on here? Politics as usual!</p>
<p>Obama got caught in his own never ending game to jerk us around as he has done so successfully for so long. Only this time he got pinned. </p>
<p>Biden’s statement focused more not less attention on Obama trying to play it both ways as he often does so well. His wealthy and influential Left Coast supporters read the situation better than Obama hoped, that BHO and their seething anger at him not coming out for gay marriage was now focused on him by Biden. </p>
<p>Even more with his very big fund raising trip on May 10, 2012, where it won’t be surprising if all of those at George Clooney’s mansion are for marrying anyone you please and that even up to half of those in the George Clooney’s $40,000 a seat dining room Thursday night to eat with Barack were rich, influential and very much GAY. Married and unmarried!</p>
<p>So Obama was smart enough to know what he had to do protect his base more than anything else and especially his very, very rich West Coast entertainment industry base. Which he expects to write him or the Obama super pac as many big checks as he wants and needs all the way up to Election Day. And then take care of him and Michelle when they finally vacate the DC Pleasure Dome.</p>
<p>Of course if Obama had any principles he would have admitted publicly as you can bet he has privately to special supporters he had no problem with gay marriage instead he wanted to have it ways and win over the anti-gay vote in the Swing States too.</p>
<p>Sorry it did not work Barack. And he has paid a price. Possibly heavy political price for his dishonesty.</p>
<p>Obama did not increase his base coming out for gay marriage all he did was keep it by telling the Truth. At the same time he has further alienated and motivated the anti-Obama crowd that sees red when it comes to anything gay, and now they will worry even less about Romney not being pure enough for the Right Wing. It is now even more about just getting rid of gay loving, devil worshipping, alien born, communist sympathizer Barack Obama.</p>
<p>In other words it was a good day for Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Obama did not win any new votes telling the Truth but he certainly lost some where it matters in states like North Carolina and even more he has energized the other side their votes and their money.</p>
<p>This proves more than anything else Obama was playing politics trying to have it both ways. Ultimately he did not get away with it because his so called base has so many other problems with all the many politically motivated positions Obama takes that the gay marriage issue became just one too many to swallow.</p>
<p>If Obama had the integrity he wants us to believe and had been who we all expected on so many other issues rather than being the Chameleon in The White House he might have gotten a pass from his supporters on gay marriage through Election Day.</p>
<p>But it wasn’t to be Obama is just too flawed.</p>
<p>Obama now has another problem related to the same issue he did not seem to have before. Guess where the Democratic National Convention is this year. That’s right North Carolina which this week voted overwhelmingly to make gay marriage constitutionally illegal in their state forever. Burning gays at the stake will wait.</p>
<p>Are the Democrats specifically is Obama going to move the Convention at this late date. Probably not which will not please the supporters he just had to placate by telling the Truth. Moving it would be an even bigger Brouhaha and no laughing matter.</p>
<p>And come September 3rd ( and even before ) in Charlotte, North Carolina, where Democrats will gather to re-nominate Obama in the state currently newly most synonymous with the ban on gay marriage the issue is guaranteed to be front and center the last place Obama wants it to be.</p>
<p>Why? Once again the election for President is not really a national election its all about 8-10 swing states that will decide whether Obama or Romney wins in November. And an issue like gay marriage could be the deciding margin in some of those all important states and decide this election in Romney’s favor.</p>
<p>Add to all this there is no doubt outside the convention center throughout the 4 days and especially on the final night when Obama makes his grand entry and acceptance speech there will be thousands upon thousands of God fearing protesters from North Carolina and everywhere else ringing the convention center shouting at the top of their lungs that marriage can only be between a man and a woman. And everyone else will go to Hell.</p>
<p>Wo is Barack Obama come September, before and after. In North Carolina and all the Swing States. Making this election a referendum on gay marriage for some over other issues.</p>
<p>It is far too early to make a prediction but if Obama loses because he does not take one or two crucial swing states don’t be surprised if the post-election analysis is that it was May 9, 2012, when Barack Obama lost this election. The day his position on gay marriage finally “evolved” and he took a position.</p>
<p>The day he finally told the Truth!</p>
<p>It would be one of the greatest ironies of American history if Barack Obama lost the Presidency this November because he finally told the Truth ! Call him the anti- George Washington!</p>
<p>After lying to us to win the Presidency in 2008.</p>
<p><em>About The Writer: Arthur Piccolo is a professional writer and commentator and often writes about Latin America for New Americas.<br />
</em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obamas-evolving-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP’s Hispanic Outreach &#8211; What A Joke!</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/the-gops-hispanic-outreach-what-a-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/the-gops-hispanic-outreach-what-a-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=47408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Felicia Persaud News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 11, 2012: This past week, the Republican National Committee decided it was time to go after the Latino vote and rolled out its Hispanic outreach efforts. Ironically, much like the GOP’s position on many issues of concern to Latinos, the move quickly turned into a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_47409" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/inclan.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/inclan-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="inclan" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-47409" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bettina Inclán</p></div>By Felicia Persaud</p>
<p>News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 11, 2012: This past week, the Republican National Committee decided it was time to go after the Latino vote and rolled out its Hispanic outreach efforts. Ironically, much like the GOP’s position on many issues of concern to Latinos, the move quickly turned into a PR nightmare.<br />
At the launch on Tuesday, May 8th, the RNC was hot to trot, showcasing their six newly-hired Hispanic outreach directors as if the civil rights bill was just inked and slamming President Obama for letting down the Hispanic community by deporting families and by failing to develop a plan for immigration reform. </p>
<p>But then Bettina Inclán, one of the directors of Hispanic outreach for the RNC, put her foot in her mouth and the PR rally turned into a PR nightmare – just like that! </p>
<p>Asked about Mitt Romney’s stance on immigration, Inclan clearly stated: “I think, as a candidate, to my understanding, that he’s still deciding what his position on immigration is, so I can’t talk about what his proposal is going to be.”</p>
<p>But minutes later, the GOP and Ms. Inclan were trying hard to do damage control. As the comment gained traction on Twitter, Democrats began weighing in.<br />
Among them was Gabriela Domenzain, Obama for America’s Director of Hispanic Press who noted: “His position may be inconvenient, but it has been clear. He has promised to veto the DREAM Act, thinks all undocumented immigrants should self-deport, has called the anti-immigrant AZ law a ‘model’ for the nation and has paraded around the country with the nation’s leading anti-immigrant voices.”</p>
<p>Soon RNC Press Secretary Kirsten Kukowski was backpedalling so fast you could not help but think she was going to crash, as she insisted: “We never said the governor is still deciding on immigration.”</p>
<p>And then came the famous retraction from an obviously pressure Ms. Inclán who Tweeted simply: “I misspoke” and instead offered up a link to Romney’s campaign website where the former governor’s views on immigration includes opposition to amnesty or any policy “that would allow illegal immigrants to cut in line,” completing a high-tech border fence and vetoing in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants.</p>
<p>Not that the link can help Romney as his stance is now clearly stated for the world and the RNC would have probably done better had they stuck to the faux pas line of Ms. Inclan: “… he’s still deciding what his position on immigration is.” </p>
<p>The GOP/RNC cannot fool any immigrant voter – Latino or not! Their rhetoric and stance on immigration is clear. They are hardliners with no solution to solving the issue of illegal immigration in a country that was built on the backs of immigrants and whose economy continues to be dependent on immigrant labor – legal or illegal. This so called outreach to Hispanics is a joke and not even nominating Marco Rubio as veep can help them win in November.<br />
The faux pas is not Ms. Inclan. The RNC/GOP’s problems with this immigrant bloc of voters go way beyond it and cannot be solved with a PR campaign, especially given the archaic views that its leadership holds, the rhetoric many within spew, especially on immigration, and the demographic make-up that fails to reflect the changing landscape of America. </p>
<p><em>The writer is founder of NewsAmericasNow, CaribPR Wire and Hard Beat Communications. </em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/the-gops-hispanic-outreach-what-a-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haiti&#8217;s Minister of the Interior Mobilizes Strong Support for Haiti in New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/haitis-minister-of-the-interior-mobilizes-strong-support-for-haiti-in-new-orleans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/haitis-minister-of-the-interior-mobilizes-strong-support-for-haiti-in-new-orleans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=47201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PORT AU PRINCE, Haiti, May 8, 2012 /PRNewswire/ &#8212; The Haitian delegation that participated in the 2012 World Cultural Economic Forum in New Orleans, led by Minister of the Interior, Thierry Mayard-Paul, returned home from a very productive visit, having signed LOIs and MOUs for development partnerships with three renowned multinational and regional organizations. Minister [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PORT AU PRINCE, Haiti, May 8, 2012 /PRNewswire/ &#8212; The Haitian delegation that participated in the 2012 World Cultural Economic Forum in New Orleans, led by Minister of the Interior, Thierry Mayard-Paul, returned home from a very productive visit, having signed LOIs and MOUs for development partnerships with three renowned multinational and regional organizations. Minister Mayard-Paul inked preliminary agreements for cooperation with Ochsner Health Systems, the World Trade Center New Orleans and the Tulane Payson Center for International Development. </p>
<p>&#8220;Our meetings in New Orleans were exceptionally rewarding and gratifying,&#8221; said Mr. Mayard-Paul. &#8220;We are solidifying valuable partnerships with outstanding agencies that will help advance our goals for building a stronger, more resilient Haiti under the umbrella of Katye Pam Poze, Haiti&#8217;s community-based decentralization program.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Mayard-Paul, Ochsner, which has been a reliable partner to Haiti since the earthquake, is interested in establishing a relationship with Haiti&#8217;s Justinien hospital and the Ecole Polytechnic De Mayaya La Victoire, allowing Ochsner physicians and medical students to provide health services in and around Cap-Haitien.  &#8220;Ochsner plans to implement a recurring medical mission to Haiti, supported by United States board-certified physicians,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They expect to launch their first mission this year.&#8221; </p>
<p>The MOI also plans to include Ochsner as a key health services partner within KPP, to help strengthen capacity building through training, and access to basic services through regional health centers and hospitals, in order to increase coverage throughout the country. &#8220;The Government of Haiti is seeking to enhance healthcare services available to Haitians by encouraging and supporting Ochsner and others to contribute to the health and well-being of the people of Haiti throughout the country,&#8221; added Mayard-Paul.</p>
<p>In signing the agreement with Tulane&#8217;s Payson Center, the Minister of the Interior emphasized that in its post-earthquake recovery process, the Republic of Haiti faces many challenges for which the Payson Center can provide meaningful solutions. &#8220;The Center is interested in providing its well-known expertise and experience in legal system reform, affordable housing and higher education, through a public-private partnership with the Government of Haiti,&#8221; said Mayard-Paul. The minister pointed out that Payson showed special interest in introducing online learning within the education module of Katye Pam Poze (KPP).<br />
In addition, Tulane expressed an interest in also providing technical assistance/collaboration in waste water management, given its expertise in this particular area and the importance of this service to Haiti and KPP. &#8220;All of this is aligned with Haitian priorities,&#8221; highlighted Mayard-Paul, who reiterated that he was &#8220;greatly encouraged to find a long-term partner who shares the government&#8217;s vision of increasing access to basic social infrastructure and services through a &#8216;bottom-up&#8217; approach so that, in the end, people would have no need to migrate out of their communities and into urban areas.  This is the cornerstone of KPP and the government&#8217;s National Decentralization Agenda,&#8221; added Mayard-Paul. </p>
<p>During the delegation&#8217;s visit with the World Trade Center New Orleans, Mayard-Paul, met with Jessica Steverson, Marketing Director of the World Trade Center and they discussed the ways in which they could partner to &#8220;bring to life&#8221; the myriad of energy, agriculture and maritime investment opportunities available in Haiti. &#8220;Louisiana and the Gulf South region have many companies with the knowledge and capacity to develop these critical areas,&#8221; assured Mayard-Paul.  During the discussion both parties agreed to work on building investment opportunities and establishing reciprocal trade missions between the two regions.<br />
Of special significance to Mayard-Paul and the Haitian delegation was a meeting with the city of New Orleans including Mayor Mitchell J. Landrieu, who successfully led the efforts to rebuild the city and restore thousands of jobs following Hurricane Katrina.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Mayor Landrieu&#8217;s rebuilding efforts set a viable model for Haiti to learn from,&#8221; remarked Mayard-Paul. &#8220;Looking at New Orleans&#8217; regional economy, it is clear it has begun to diversify, spearheading growth in knowledge-based industries.  As a result, entrepreneurship in New Orleans has spiked dramatically post-Katrina.  With jobs a pressing need in Haiti, this is a valuable take-away from our visit.&#8221;</p>
<p>The City of New Orleans welcomed the idea of partnering with the Ministry of the Interior and the Government of Haiti by providing technical expertise and support in different fields that enable building back a better Haiti, as well as facilitating other investment opportunities identified by the minister.<br />
Mayard-Paul was &#8220;humbled and grateful&#8221; for the warm reception provided by WCEF and its participants to Katye Pam Poze, Haiti&#8217;s innovative &#8220;bottom-up&#8221; approach to community integration and sustainable development, which is focused on improving delivery of government services, as well as fostering development and job creation by promoting strong community involvement.   &#8220;KPP has been designed as a holistic community-based program, where the end prize is to improve the quality of life of the Haitian people by enabling safe and prosperous communities right where they live, so they don&#8217;t have to migrate to urban centers to look for jobs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/haitis-minister-of-the-interior-mobilizes-strong-support-for-haiti-in-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting For Caribbean Rum</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/fighting-for-caribbean-rum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/fighting-for-caribbean-rum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 03:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.V.I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=47064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Jessop News Americas, LONDON, England, Mon. May 7, 2012: A few days ago, the Caricom Secretary General, Irwin LaRoque, revealed in Washington that Cariforum nations had begun a process which if unresolved, will lead to a full complaint at the World Trade Organisation, (WTO), against the US Government in relation to rum. Following [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/rums.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/rums.jpg" alt="" title="rums" width="300" height="200" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-47065" /></a>By David Jessop</p>
<p>News Americas, LONDON, England, Mon. May 7, 2012: A few days ago, the Caricom Secretary General, Irwin LaRoque, revealed in Washington that Cariforum nations had begun a process which if unresolved, will lead to a full complaint at the World Trade Organisation, (WTO), against the US Government in relation to rum.</p>
<p>Following representations by the West Indies Rum and Spirits Producers Association, (WIRSPA), the regional industry association, Caricom Governments last December formally expressed to the US their deep concern about measures being taken by the governments of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and Puerto Rico to provide multinational rum producers with subsidies under a programme that makes use of excise taxes on rum received from the US Federal Government. </p>
<p>Caricom subsequently raised the issue at a meeting of the US-Caricom Trade and Investment Council in March in Georgetown. Then last week the Caricom Secretary General took the opportunity, during meetings with US officials in Washington, to stress the seriousness of the issue and its implications if left unresolved. </p>
<p>As a consequence, a US Caricom technical meeting is expected to take place shortly. This is intended to lead to political exchanges with the United States Trade Representative, (USTR), aimed at resolving the issue. At the same time Cariforum Ambassadors in Washington have been meeting with others in the US administration and Congress to make clear the Caribbean’s concerns.</p>
<p>In a process that potentially sets David against Goliath, the Caribbean has initiated a dialogue with USTR that challenges an arrangement that enables the USVI to offer one of the world’s largest and wealthiest distilling groups, Diageo, huge subsidies. The concern is that if the matter goes unchallenged it  will result in Caribbean producers seeing their presently significant share of the US market wiped out by subsidised product, and other large international distilling groups seeking to locate in the USVI and Puerto Rico to seek similar advantage.</p>
<p>As with most trade disputes, the matter is complicated.</p>
<p>The Caribbean’s case revolves around the fact that subsidies offered by the USVI to the multinational rum producers Diageo and Cruzan are inconsistent with WTO rules in as much as they involve prohibited export subsidies, make use of discriminatory taxation, and use such subsidies to cause adverse effects to the interests of other WTO members, in this case the countries of Cariforum.  </p>
<p>Specifically the Caribbean’s case relates to the application by the US Government of a ‘cover-over’ programme which remits 98 per cent of all excise duties raised on rums sold in the US back to the US territories of Puerto Rico and the USVI.  In 2010, this amounted to approximately US$450m.  </p>
<p>In order to secure a greater amount of this ‘cover-over’ support, the USVI and Puerto Rico have since 2008 entered into new contractual arrangements with major multinational producers and offering extremely generous concessions, subsidies and long-term support, in exchange for them agreeing to site their distilleries and production facilities in their territories.</p>
<p>In the case of the USVI, its government signed a contract in 2008 with Diageo that promised the company very large subsidies over a thirty year period in return for the company’s commitment to produce locally all Captain Morgan rum sold in the United States.  Other deals have been struck by Bacardi and Serralés with Puerto Rico.</p>
<p>Estimates suggest that that in these new contracts the value of the operating subsidies alone exceeds the actual production cost per litre of bulk rum. It is also believed that the combined new production capacity which is planned as part of the agreements will be equivalent to at least 80 per cent of current US rum consumption.  </p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, rum producers in the Anglophone Caribbean, Haiti and the Dominican Republic have viewed this development with alarm. So too have Cariforum governments which have recognised the dangers for themselves and  the region’s largest agriculture-based export industry which generates an estimated US$500m in foreign exchange and well over US$250m in tax revenues, which is to say nothing of the industry’s role as an important provider of employment or its close relationship to tourism.</p>
<p>While there is understanding of the economic problems facing the USVI, the reality is that the US Congress has allowed its USVI development program to divert hundreds of millions to primarily provide a development program for the largest distilled spirits companies in the world.  In this way the US is damaging one of the few competitive industries that Cariforum nations have and which helps underpin the economic viability of small and sometimes vulnerable Caribbean states. </p>
<p>For this reason the dispute is at a Government to Government rather than an industry level. </p>
<p>There is also a sense that the manner in which the cover-over program is being used raises serious questions about US consistency in relation to its international obligations under WTO rules. </p>
<p>The US has for many years taken a leadership role in promoting strong WTO disciplines on trade distorting subsidies, so it is surprising that it has allowed a situation of competitive harm to arise.  International distilling groups may have more political and economic muscle to flex in Washington, London and Brussels than do the countries of Cariforum, but the region has the facts and strict rules of world trade on its side.  </p>
<p>This is therefore an instance where Caribbean Governments and the people of Cariforum need to stand tall, draw the line in Washington and, if necessary, in Geneva , and fight to win.  </p>
<p>Rum has a special place in the hearts and minds of Caribbean people. It is a product that brings identity through small producers to the islands and countries of Cariforum from which it comes.  Unlike the product of large multinational distilling groups the success of Cariforum producers does not result from artificial tax breaks, transfer pricing or subsidy. Instead it is an industry dominated by small local distillers whose product is export oriented, brings much needed foreign exchange, adds value to primary agriculture and provides significant levels of tax and revenue to Governments struggling to deliver social programmes.</p>
<p>That is why rum has always been a product worth fighting for, as Europe knows to its cost and the US is about to discover.</p>
<p><em>David Jessop is the Director of the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at david.jessop@caribbean-council.org.Previous columns can be found at www.caribbean-council.org<br />
</em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/fighting-for-caribbean-rum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Politics and Political Infighting in Grenada</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/party-politics-and-political-infighting-in-grenada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/party-politics-and-political-infighting-in-grenada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grenada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=46954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Wendy C Grenade News Americas, ST. GEORGE’S, Grenada, Sat. May 5, 2012: Recent political developments in Grenada confirm that the outcome of the 2008 general elections represents an unsettled ‘settling’ to the two-party system. After the electoral victory of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in July 2008, many Grenadians expected political healing, reconciliation and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_46955" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Tillman-Thomas.gif"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Tillman-Thomas-300x250.gif" alt="" title="Tillman-Thomas" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-46955" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Grenada PM Tillman Thomas</p></div>By Wendy C Grenade</p>
<p>News Americas, ST. GEORGE’S, Grenada, Sat. May 5, 2012: Recent political developments in Grenada confirm that the outcome of the 2008 general elections represents an unsettled ‘settling’ to the two-party system. After the electoral victory of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in July 2008, many Grenadians expected political healing, reconciliation and a break from the past.</p>
<p>Many observers welcomed the ‘wind of change’ that was seemingly blowing through the Caribbean and hoped for a new kind of politics that transcended decades of authoritarianism, corruption, conflict, political immaturity and power mongering. Four years on, there is no doubt that the current political climate is reminiscent of the past. Grenada has again become a theatre for political intrigue. </p>
<p>For those of us who study politics, the Grenada case presents rich fodder for political analysis. However, I am of the view that given Grenada’s turbulent political history, Grenadians have no appetite for political wrangling and instability, particularly when the rate of unemployment is estimated to be well over 30 percent and ordinary Grenadians continue to struggle daily just to make ends meet.  </p>
<p>History continues to be in the present. As was the case in 1983 and 1989, evidence suggests that the Prime Minister of Grenada has again lost control of the high command of the ruling party. In the upcoming weeks, Prime Minister Tillman Thomas has to confront two serious challenges. The first is the proposed No Confidence motion which has been filed by the opposition New National Party (NNP). If he survives the No Confidence motion, Prime Minister Thomas will then have to strategically navigate forces within his own party at the NDC convention, which is scheduled for July this year.  If we use history as a guide, it seems that the political future of Prime Minister Thomas and the various factions of the ruling NDC hang in the balance.  I wish to examine possible scenarios:</p>
<p>1.	Continued Patchwork Politics &#8211; The factions in the NDC leadership can attempt to mend the rift and complete their mandate until general elections are constitutionally due next year. After all, hard core politics often revolve around conflict and marriages of convenience. When there is infighting within political parties, members of various factions often develop the art of skilful pretence, hold their noses and manage conflict to preserve personal and political gains.  This is quite normal in most political parties. However, given the political battle that is raging within the NDC leadership, this option may not be feasible. If the NDC in its current configuration is to be mended, this will require serious mediation and the rebuilding of trust on all sides. In my view, too much damage has been done. In the interest of Grenada, it may be best for the factions in the party to go their separate ways now. </p>
<p>The question then arises, who will have the legitimate claim to ownership of the NDC party? Other questions emerge. In a parliamentary democracy, is it principled, or even desirable, for the Prime Minister to continue to lead a parliamentary group when it is alleged that several of his MPs no longer have confidence in him? On the other hand, is it principled, or even desirable, for some former members of the New Jewel Movement (NJM) who were accepted into the NDC party (despite strong reservations by some members of the NDC leadership) to seek to wrest power from the political leader, cognisant of Grenada’s troubled political history? In my view, when principles clash, it is time for the people to decide the way forward through fresh elections.  Patchwork politics must no longer be an option.</p>
<p>2.	No Confidence Motion &#8211; The NDC MPs who have difficulty with Prime Minister Thomas’ leadership style and his ineffectiveness in government can decide to support the No Confidence motion filed by the opposition NNP. It is their right so to do. If the No Confidence motion is successful, the Prime Minister has two options: (a) he can ask another individual who he believes will command the confidence of parliament to form the government or (b) he can dissolve the parliament and call new elections. There is precedence in the Caribbean where a No Confidence motion against a prime minister was supported by MPs from his ruling party. In 1994 dissident MPs in the ruling Democratic Labour Party (DLP) in Barbados decided to support a No Confidence motion against then Prime Minister Lloyd Erskine Sandiford. The prime minister decided to seek a fresh mandate from the people and the DLP suffered electoral defeat in the 1994 general elections and remained in the political wilderness from 1994 to 2008! If members of the NDC parliamentary group choose to support the No Confidence motion filed by the Opposition, they may just face a similar fate.  The electorate in the Caribbean does not reward what it perceives to be disloyalty. Several questions are pertinent here.<br />
If MPs who were elected on an NDC ticket, give support to the NNP in the No Confidence motion against the Prime Minister, what will be the trade off? How will they gain? Does a No Confidence motion against Tillman Thomas automatically translate to victory at the polls for the dissident faction of the NDC? Evidence suggests that the NNP does not need the support of NDC MPs to win a general election. Will they want history to record the fact that they brought down a government that they once pledged to work with and support to build a new Grenada? Will the base of the NDC party and other Grenadians who voted to get rid of Mitchell in 2008 reward them for this act of political recklessness? The reality is, a divided NDC will split the vote and increase the chances of electoral victory for the NNP. It may be in the interest of the dissident NDC MPs to wait for the NDC convention where they can seek to further consolidate their power in the party prior to general elections. Support for the No Confidence motion will not benefit them politically. In fact, they may commit political suicide if they so do. </p>
<p>3.	The Scramble at the NDC Convention &#8211; If the Prime Minister survives the No Confidence motion and there is a successful bid to unseat him as political leader in the NDC convention that is scheduled for July this year, he will officially be Prime Minister of an NDC-led government but not political leader of the NDC party. The late Prime Minister Herbert Blaize faced a similar dilemma in 1989. His response was to form The National Party (TNP), which did not make any inroads in Grenada’s politics. In the 1990 general elections, TNP obtained 17.36% of the popular vote and two parliamentary seats. By 1995 TNP received a mere 6.46% of the popular vote and did not win any parliamentary seats. That party, for the most part, withered into thin air, (although some of its members were absorbed into other political parties). Prime Minister Thomas may well be guided by history.  To avoid this scenario, should the Prime Minister preempt the outcome of the NDC convention and call a date for general elections prior to the convention? He can use the powers of the Office of Prime Minister and choose this option to avoid further erosion of his power in the party. The question arises, if the NDC convention goes ahead and the political leader and his faction lose further grip of the party, will the Prime Minister be able to govern effectively where there is a clash of powers: the powers of the Prime Minister and the powers of the party leadership? Is this scenario in the best interest of Grenada? I do not think so.  </p>
<p>It seems clear that in the interest of Grenada a new mandate is necessary through general elections. However, Grenada may be returning to an unstable multi-party system, which is unhealthy for democracy. It is unfortunate that the NDC did not capitalize on an opportunity to re-build and heal Grenada. It is unfortunate that they did not learn the lessons of the past. It is so unfortunate that the NDC was born in conflict and has not been able to consolidate a well-functioning political party. At this juncture in Grenada’s history, the political system needs cleansing.  We need to move beyond patchwork politics and search for meaningful alternatives beyond the NDC and the NNP. As difficult as it might be now for Prime Minister Thomas and the NDC, the best course of action may be to go back to the people for a fresh mandate and let the chips fall where they may. They must know, however, that Grenadians will hold the NDC leadership accountable for reckless politics and political ineptness at a time of gross economic uncertainty.  </p>
<p><em>Dr. Wendy C. Grenade is a Grenadian who lectures in Political Science at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados. </em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/party-politics-and-political-infighting-in-grenada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardinal Dolan Gets It Right On Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/cardinal-dolan-gets-it-right-on-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/cardinal-dolan-gets-it-right-on-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=46777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Felicia Persaud News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 4, 2012: Catholic Cardinal Timothy Dolan hit the nail on the head when he told a national TV network recently that there is a need for a compassionate stance on immigration reform in the United States. Dolan told MSNBC’s “Jansing &#038; Co. what many have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_24842" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Newly-Elested-Cardinal-Timothy-Dolan.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Newly-Elested-Cardinal-Timothy-Dolan-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="Newly Elevated Cardinal Timothy Dolan" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-24842" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Cardinal Timothy Dolan</p></div>By Felicia Persaud</p>
<p>News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 4, 2012: Catholic Cardinal Timothy Dolan hit the nail on the head when he told a national TV network recently that there is a need for a compassionate stance on immigration reform in the United States.</p>
<p>Dolan told MSNBC’s “Jansing &#038; Co. what many have been shouting from the sidelines forever &#8211; that Republicans must “come up with a much saner, more civil, more just immigration policy” that Democrats can support and hopefully, our very smart, articulate President who claims to support immigration reform, can sign into law.</p>
<p>“When you have a policy that splits up families, when you have a policy that drives people underground, when you have a policy where now the government, whether it be in Arizona or Alabama, is asking our soup kitchens to ask for documentation before they give people food or housing or clothing or medical care, that’s not right. That’s not Catholic. That’s not Christian. That’s not religious. And it’s not American,” the leader of the Catholic Archdiocese of New York said.</p>
<p>The call from the head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops could not come at a better time – especially as the Supreme Court Justices are actually contemplating the legality of the Arizona law and as the Republican front runner, Mitt Romney, continues to hold on to an immigration reform plan that offers no real solutions. (How are you going to deport 11 plus million people Mitt? Tell us please!)</p>
<p>In a country where over 80 percent or some 224,457,000 identify themselves as of the Christian faith, particularly in states that are busy passing laws that profile immigrants, splits up families and drives people underground, one cannot help but wonder about the all round hypocrisy.</p>
<p>In the Bible belt regions of Arizona and Alabama, a recent election exit polls claims that over 80 percent of the states’ voters labeled themselves as Christians. Yet, these are the states unleashing the harshest laws on undocumented migrants, many of whom are part of the Christian Church.<br />
The Bible is clear on how immigrants should be treated as it notes in Exodus 22:21: “You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt.”</p>
<p>And again in Leviticus 19:33-34 – “When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.”</p>
<p>So one can’t help but ask: Which Bible are these so called Christian lawmakers reading? </p>
<p>Still it’s not surprising that these southern and south-western states are the ones waging these harsh laws against poor migrants.</p>
<p>Divisions have always existed within the Christian denominations in these U.S. states over gender, class, and race. Just look at the battle by many in Alabama especially for civil rights &#8211; when blacks were enslaved, discriminated against, not allowed in many White churches and forced to form their own houses of worship.</p>
<p>Now in 2012, the lawmakers in the states with the worst history of civil rights violations are revisiting the past by going after immigrants whose only crime is to seek a better life in this country by taking jobs that Americans themselves won’t even consider.</p>
<p>It’s time many of these so called Christian leaders and lawmakers truly look in the mirror and ask themselves what the actions of a real Christian should be in dealing with the lesser of their brethren – even if they just happen to be brown and black? </p>
<p><em><strong>The writer is founder of NewsAmericasNow, CaribPR Wire and Hard Beat Communications. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/cardinal-dolan-gets-it-right-on-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Has Some Serious Explaining To Do</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obama-has-some-serious-explaining-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obama-has-some-serious-explaining-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 22:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=46771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Arthur Piccolo News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 4, 2012: The situation could change in the coming days but for right now President Barack Obama is looking very, very bad in his handling of the matter of the Chinese dissident lawyer Chen Guangcheng. First of all, relieving Obama of responsibility here is nonsense. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_46772" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/BT32820_3-obamapeaceprize.jpg"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/BT32820_3-obamapeaceprize-300x250.jpg" alt="" title="]obamanobelpeaceprize" width="300" height="250" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-46772" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nobel Peace Prize - What A Joke!</p></div>By Arthur Piccolo</p>
<p>News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. May 4, 2012:  The situation could change in the coming days but for right now President Barack Obama is looking very, very bad in his handling of the matter of the Chinese dissident lawyer Chen Guangcheng.</p>
<p>First of all, relieving Obama of responsibility here is nonsense. There can be no doubt even while he was on his expensive taxpayer funded wasteful campaign trip to Afghanistan he was being fully informed about Guangcheng’s flight to supposed safety in the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, what transpired during his stay and the manner of him leaving “voluntarily” into the waiting arms of the repressive Chinese authorities. Obama knew all that or should.</p>
<p>As of right now, Thursday, May 3, 2011, this is turning into a disaster of lethal proportions to Obama’s character and credibility, except for those of us who already say what character and credibility are you talking about when it comes to Obama.</p>
<p>Certainly the Wall Street Journal and other news sources are reporting that Guangcheng was encouraged to leave the U.S. embassy if not even more forcefully pressured at least being told he could have confidence the loving Chinese authorities who have repeatedly beat him and his family while keeping him imprisoned would take care of him now.</p>
<p>Who with even a shred of compassion or logic in the U.S. government would believe the Chinese madmen would provide this celebrated dissident to live a normal life and go on his merry way and even less so making these concessions to the Americans?</p>
<p>Planet Earth to Barack Obama. This is not believable now that Chen Guangcheng has left the embassy …</p>
<p>Well it looks like the Chinese are taking care of him the same way this repressive regime this collective dictatorship the Goon Squad the Chinese Politburo took care of him before and does thousands upon thousands even millions of Chinese men and women and their families who have the audacity to believe they are entitled to some very basic human freedoms.<br />
Keep in mind it is an open secret no secret at all from Day One the Obama Administration has been soft on Chinese government repression never making it a front burner issue always placing it on the back burner raised in the vaguest terms which the Chinese authorities could ignore Obama’s feeble try at compassion and whitewash critics of Obama’s softness on the issue.</p>
<p>Well surprise! It is now time for Truth or Consequences!</p>
<p>Guangcheng almost immediately after leaving the safety of the U.S. compound in Beijing offered a free ride to a hospital by the U.S. Ambassador Gary Locke who then quickly departed.</p>
<p>Guangcheng said to himself: “O My God (not out loud that would get him in more trouble) WHAT HAVE I DONE?”</p>
<p>After a dramatic almost impossible escape from his home, imprisonment and somehow sneaking past the goons and into the U.S. Embassy, he left handed over to the same vindictive officials he had just fled from and wasting his efforts.<br />
This smells bad …. Really Bad!</p>
<p>If Obama had not been so interested in pleasing the Chinese Masters then American officials would have never recommended that Guangcheng leave the compound and would have worked hard to get him to stay without either at minimum a written signed agreement from the Chinese leaders to respect his rights and provide specific guarantees about where and how he would be allowed to live and speak out freely.</p>
<p>Even that would call for skepticism but at least we could nail the Chinese with the document if they reneged. Without that agreement at the least America should have kept him in the protective cover of our Embassy and formally told the Chinese we were encouraging him to seek asylum in the U.S.<br />
So President Obama likes to take very long trips to far away places for short stays as he did to Afghanistan this week. Well Obama can fly to China and personally escort Guangcheng and his family back to freedom and Washington, DC on Air Force One.</p>
<p>But that would take courage on Barack Obama’s part. Not his strong suit! Rather he’d prefer to sign long tern agreements with one of the most corrupt leaders on Earth Harman Karzi.</p>
<p>Whatever happens with Chen Guangcheng in the coming days, if some face saving resolution appears to take place until all the media attention disappears, nothing will change the fundamental issue of Barack Obama’s approach to Chinese repression of its citizens and his supportive attitude toward the Chinese regime. Anyone forgot the glitzy State Dinner the Obamas lavished on the Chinese Premier last year?</p>
<p>This at the same time that President Obama’s fellow Nobel Peace Prize winner Chinese human rights activist Liu Xiaobo sat in a Chinese jail where he still is. His crime? Winning the Nobel Peace Prize! </p>
<p>WHY did Barack Obama get the Nobel Peace Prize?</p>
<p>Answer: there is no good reason. </p>
<p>Obviously the Nobel Committee was as conned by Barack Obama early on as were the rest of us. Obama would have refused this unjustified honor if he had character but he didn’t hesitate for a moment to say yes I will take it no matter. Give me the Medal, let me hang it around my neck.</p>
<p>The only logic to Obama getting a Nobel Prize is that Alfred Noble himself was the exact opposite of his prizes. Noble made his fortune selling gunpowder to the world so humans could “effectively” kill each other. In Obama’s case, what he has done is become one of the most militaristic U.S. Presidents &#8211; the exact opposite of what most who voted for him expected.</p>
<p>China, Afghanistan, Pakistan &#8211; President Barack Obama is doing nothing to present a new America to the world. It is just more of the same old stuff. He is even capable of making the Right Wing Republicans and Mitt Romney look good on China. They did not hesitate to condemn the collective Chinese dictators.<br />
The ultimate importance of Chen Guangcheng and his fate is the clear message it delivers about the ever ambiguous, always pliable Barack Obama, who lacks the character or conviction to lead us into the future or challenge the repressive Chinese leadership.</p>
<p>Hope you like being stuck in the past, present and the Status Quo. Barack Obama will never deliver the better future he promised.</p>
<p><strong><em>About The Writer: Arthur Piccolo is a professional writer and commentator and often writes about Latin America for New Americas.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/obama-has-some-serious-explaining-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can The EPA Be Made To Work?</title>
		<link>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/can-the-epa-be-made-to-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/can-the-epa-be-made-to-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>felicia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsamericasnow.com/?p=46442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Jessop News Americas, LONDON, England, Mon. April 30, 2012: Is the value of the 2008 EU Cariforum Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with Europe attenuating or can it still be made to work to the region’s advantage? Trying to answer this and other questions about the success or otherwise of the agreement &#8211; which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epa_agreement.gif"><img src="http://www.newsamericasnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epa_agreement-300x250.gif" alt="" title="epa_agreement" width="300" height="250" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-46443" /></a>By David Jessop</p>
<p>News Americas, LONDON, England, Mon. April 30, 2012: Is the value of the 2008 EU Cariforum Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with Europe attenuating or can it still be made to work to the region’s advantage? </p>
<p>Trying to answer this and other questions about the success or otherwise of the agreement &#8211; which asymmetrically freed trade between Europe and most Caribbean nations while providing support with regional integration &#8211; is far from easy. </p>
<p>It is clear that very large sums of money are being made available by Europe &#8211; probably for the last time &#8211; to support regional integration and to meet many of the technical requirements of the EPA. However, despite exhortations and endless meetings and seminars in the region it is hard to find any evidence that use is being made of the trade aspects of the agreement other than in relation to the improved access it offers in the area of commodity exports. </p>
<p>As a consequence partners on both sides of the Atlantic seem to be growing ever more concerned.  </p>
<p>Recently the EU Delegate to Barbados and the OECS, Valerino Diaz, criticized Caribbean Governments for not taking ownership of the agreement. The region’s governments, he said, have to ensure that legislative and other frameworks are in place so that the private sector can reap the benefits.  Mr Diaz also criticized the regional private sector for standing passively by on the sidelines and not lobbying governments to have the necessary implementing legislation enacted. </p>
<p>At the level of Caribbean Governments there are other concerns. Recently some senior political figures have suggested in private that EPA implementation might be delayed. They argue that there should be a review of the process as only four Cariforum nations have ratified the agreement and just five have implemented tariff reductions. They also point to problems impeding implementation such as the economic crisis in the region; Europe’s decision to graduate the Caribbean out of bilateral development assistance; negative growth; and falling government revenues.</p>
<p>Concern too has been expressed in a recent Caricom press release which noted that there was little awareness of the EPA’s foreign direct investment advantages among the Cariforum private sector or EU investors.</p>
<p>These doubts are likely to become more acute and public in Europe in particular. </p>
<p>The region is about to be graduated out of most development assistance by Europe and it had been hoped that regional integration and private sector led growth would in effect be a compensating factor; the failure of the Cariforum-EU EPA sends negative signals to other regions of the ACP still to conclude their EPA negotiations with Europe; there is a background concern that what little advantage the Caribbean had is about to be swept away by Europe’s  Association Agreements with Central America, Andean and eventually Mercosur nations; and much of Caricom’s funding comes from Europe. </p>
<p>But speak to the private sector in Europe and the Caribbean about the EPA and they see the issues differently.  Many companies say it is an irrelevance; that entrepreneurs will anyway find ways around problems and government restrictions; they will only take investment and trade decisions that result in the most profitable outcomes; and that new and better opportunities for the region are emerging in locations other than Europe.  </p>
<p>Some also point to the fact that what is on offer is limited given the fact that much of the region has had duty and quota free access to the region from well before the EPA was agreed. They feel that key areas of trade in goods and services have been excluded in the tariff schedules or are still subject to regulation to protect the Caribbean or Europe. Others suggest that Cariforum as a whole is unattractive as a trade partner because it is geographically fragmented, is not a single market and consists of nations at widely different levels of development without the free movement of goods.</p>
<p>The consequence seems to be that no one can point to any big investments or new trade flows that can be directly related to the EPA other than in relation to commodities.</p>
<p>Despite this there are new opportunities offered by the EPA to SME’s in particular and it is far from being a science for Caribbean companies to take advantage of them. Neither does it need big money.</p>
<p>In particular, there are prospects for establishing EU Cariforum ventures with the region’s growing services sector especially in relation to creative or knowledge based industries in a broad range of areas. There are also opportunities in value-added agro-processing and related luxury goods and possibilities in high value agriculture and fisheries if economies of scale or consolidation of production can be achieved, and airlift made available at competitive prices. All such opportunities relate to small but vibrant newer areas of Caribbean economic activity.</p>
<p>Working to a relatively small EU supported budget, Caribbean Export has realized this. Together with a few private sector associations such as Trinidad’s Chamber of Commerce which recently visited Europe to identify business leads, they alone seem to be operating in the real world of business and doing, rather than talking or playing big politics.</p>
<p>What they are finding is that by focusing on visits to Europe; small catalytic events; a sectoral approach; individual meetings and contacts; and by quietly picking winners, it is possible to foster the establishment of business to business relationships and promote specific opportunities. </p>
<p>Four years had passed since the EPA was signed and very little that is practical had happened. Huge sums of money were spent on the negotiations and all that has followed. Despite this it is seemingly impossible to point to a single EPA specific success story to be used as a case study.</p>
<p>What is odd about all of this is that identifying business opportunity is not rocket science. While there may be matters to do with implementation, standards and other issues that Governments need to address, bringing the right business people together and then standing back does not require huge subsidies or support. It just needs the creation of realistic well thought through opportunities for informal dialogue. </p>
<p>Friends across the region might not welcome me saying so but I for one have the sense that if Caribbean Export and the few private sector associations that visit Europe do not now take the initiative to create catalytic opportunities at home and overseas, the Dominican Republic apart, the trade aspect of EPA will be found dead in the waters of the Atlantic.</p>
<p><em>David Jessop is the Director of the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at david.jessop@caribbean-council.org. Previous columns can be found at www.caribbean-council.org.<br />
</em><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsamericasnow.com/can-the-epa-be-made-to-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

