By Arthur Piccolo
News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. June 24, 2016: Transparency was going to be another mark of the Obama Presidency.
But it’s really one more disappointment!
That Barack Obama has been as good as any President HIDING information from the American people. Most of all, by a relentless denial of and endless delay of Freedom of Information requests that needs to be filed ONLY because information that should be available without them is not.
The Grand Daddy of them all Obama inherited from President Bush. And President Obama has been just as good at HIDING those 28 pages.
What 28 pages? Those infamous 28 pages about 9/11/2001.
Time to bring in our main media partner The New York Times…
“A Saudi Imam, 2 Hijackers and Lingering 9/11 Mystery” from the June 17 issue.
Let’s begin …
“Inside an opulent palace in Riyadh late one evening in February 2004, two American investigators interrogated a man they believed might hold answers to one of the lingering mysteries of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks: What role, if any, did officials in Saudi Arabia’s government play in the plot ?”
“The man under questioning, Fahad al-Thumairy, had been a Saudi consular official based in Los Angeles and the imam of a mosque visited by two of the hijackers.”
Here is the PUNCH line …
“But nearly 15 years after the attacks on New York and Washington, the question of a Saudi connection has arisen again amid new calls for the release of a long-classified section of a 2002 congressional inquiry into the attacks that discusses a possible Saudi role in the terrorist plot — the so-called 28 pages, whose secrecy has made them almost mythical.”
28 PAGES of the 9/11 Report still HIDDEN by President Obama?
Why O Why President Obama?
Why protect the Sauds when there apparently in nothing in those 28 pages that absolutely implicates the Saud Family on the 9/11/01 attacks? Although again apparently those 28 pages raise serious UNANSWERED questions that would be answered if a Saud connection is confirmed.
Let’s be clear – the idea that the Saud so called “princes” sat down and planned the 9/11 attacks is probably preposterous but they did not have to do so to play an essential role in those horrendous attacks.
Back to The New York Times …
“At the F.B.I., the Sept. 11 plot officially remains an open case. While there is broad agreement on how it unfolded, there are aspects of the investigation that remain unresolved. And the mystery begins with the arrival at Los Angeles International Airport on Jan. 15, 2000, of two Saudi men who more than year and a half later would be among the hijackers who crashed American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon.”
“Apart from their proven devotion to the jihadist cause, the men, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, seemed unlikely choices for a pair of terrorists who would have to survive, and plot for months, in the United States. Neither spoke English or had experience navigating American life.”
“That circumstance would make it all the more critical for the F.B.I., after the attacks, to find out whether the two hijackers received help after reaching Los Angeles. But after an exhaustive canvass of hotels, investigators were unable to find any definitive evidence of where and how Mr. Hazmi and Mr. Mihdhar spent their first two weeks in the United States. By some accounts, however, they worshiped at the King Fahad Mosque in the Culver City area, where Mr. Thumairy was an imam, and they may have stayed in a nearby apartment rented by the mosque.”
So here is the other point …
The Saud Family and their underlings are well known for funding and cultivating RADICAL Muslim clerics the kind who might well think in terms of supporting ATTACKING the United States of America.
The fact REMAINS a pivotal mystery how many of the hijackers got to the U.S., survived here day to day until 9/11 and how they got absolutely essential assistance to prepare themselves to be “successful” hijackers.
The most likely possible answer to these unanswered questions is the possibility radical Saudi funded anti-Americans Muslim clerics and some of their disciples in America furnished the essential support.
Here is one sample from The New York Times article …
“There were other tantalizing suggestions of a possible network of supporters. Mr. Hazmi and Mr. Mihdhar began worshiping at a San Diego mosque where the imam was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American cleric who years later would became an infamous online recruiter for Al Qaeda. A Yemeni student named Mohdar Abdullah drove them around, helped them open bank accounts and connected them with flight schools. Two Saudi naval officers living in San Diego had telephone contact with Mr. Hazmi.”
So again what about those 28 pages from The Times this ….
“What the 28 pages are is a summary of the information given to the agencies for further investigation,” she said. “Nobody should be expecting that the 28 pages will give a final conclusion.”
And this …
“The commission’s final report said that “we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded” Al Qaeda. Today, some commission staff members point out that the wording did not rule out the possibility that lower-ranking Saudi officials had assisted the hijackers. They also said the commission operated under extreme time pressure and was not able to follow up fully on every lead.”
I call that a rather weak disclaimer especially since Saudi Arabia, as I call it here The Saud Family Estate, is fully and carefully controlled by “the family.” Anyone further down the food chain does not do anything without their approval and is more than likely in their employ one way or another.
Let’s wrap this up and the key point about Obama and the 28 pages.
President Obama is NOT releasing them even though he has no justification for not doing so for both a general and very personal reason. Generally of he does they will further undermine the bogus “friendship” between the Sauds and the United States providing more graphic proof that there is no good reason for our government to be in bed with these Degenerates.
But there is more Obama’s approaching “retirement. The super RICH Saud Family is one of the best sources for funding the whims of those especially EX-Presidents who are seeking the Big Bucks for their projects.
Barack and Michelle are very aware how good the Suads have been to Bill and Hillary and their “needs” both personal and their Glorious Foundation not that there is any day light between those two “needs.”
Who do you think is going to be among the most generous contributors to the “good deeds” (sic ) of the Obamas in the coming years?
What a perfect use for a phrase I have yet to use in Obama’s America: “Don’t bite the hand that will feed you.”
Isn’t that right Barack?